Work Smarter, Not Harder

Love is probably what propels people into ideas of gaining personal success. The idea is to have a nice job where you don’t kill or poison yourself, have great  perks and insurance to cover medical expenses and personal maintenance. To be able to make enough money to be ‘content’ enough so that greed and penny pinching doesn’t motivate personal or professional stress.

How does love motivate such ambitious thoughts? Well, who doesn’t want to feel well taken care of?

But is it a little… presumptuous or self righteous to asks these things of industry and government? No, because most people in a community or society are motivated to take care of others and through them feel taken care of. The greater industrial revolutions have happened in mass production and labour to better motivate cost effective changes, but for the most part on industry. Industry for the most part has figure heads and controlling interests who pay themselves huge percentages of a companies earnings. Why not? Shouldn’t a franchise owner by rights, be able to pay himself well? Why should it be any different for large industrial corporations or leaders? Well the answer is simple…

Let’s say there is a family that owns a few fast food chains. The Berlitz Family has 6 A&W restaurants. The franchise name takes 15% of total earnings every month. 35% goes back into the stores for stock and supplies. That’s 50%, put labour costs on top of that and you have perhaps 60% of total earnings gone. Let’s say these 6 stores do fairly well and make about $15, 000 a week with stock and supplie orders being about $3, 000 per store. That’s $12, 000 in stock and supply a week out of about a hundred thousand dollars. That isn’t bad for over head for that kind of profit generation. But let’s say because they get good traffic labour is up and costs are up. So let’s say about $15,000 for supplies and about the same in labour. That means it takes two stores entire earnings to keep up the other 4, which is actually a fairly realistic outlook on the way some franchises operate, it’s part of the success and rampant growth of a lot of chains and why some owners are repeat owners. On top of these costs you have insurance, legal fees, licensing fees, a whole slew of fees and bills for each location. Phone and internet, security, rent the list of expenses goes on and on. In the end a guy who you would assume is a millionaire because he has multiple little chain stores, is really getting by maybe just a little better than other folks.  Depending on the franchise he might not even be able to pay himself as much as he would like or as much as is possible.

On the industrial side of things a company let’s call ‘Spartan Steel’ acquires and melts down scrap iron. They make only one product I beams for homes. Spartan Steel has 2 factories across North America. The company hires people with less than a high-school education and reformed criminals, reformed criminals get them a small tax credit. As a whole Spartan Steel has their workers earning a nice wage considering their history and education. But their insurance is terrible, which is barely debated or even regarded either because of the overall education and lifestyle of their workers. It isn’t nothing but they have some insurance.

Spartan employs about 60 people per factory on various levels of pay and insurance. The customer service, database, and ordering staff make a nice wage and have nice insurance and may or may not have university or college degrees.  The administrative staff makes the biggest overall wage has complete comprehensive insurance, and all of which have a degree or a proven background. Each factory brings in almost 20 million a year, with about 6-7 million going back into expenses which leaves a float of at least 10 million between them, regardless of critical meltdowns or setbacks. Of this ten million the founder and his partners take 3 million each on top of regular wages and benefits they pay themselves. ‘Spartan Steel’ has been snow balling profits since it started and has been operational for almost 35 years.

Now is it silly or morally ambiguous to assume or suppose the industrial owners should have some kind of maximum that they can pay themselves, just like how the Berlitz family has? They can only take out so much before they are in debt to themselves, which is a reality of some small businesses.

Everyone is out to make a dollar in  business, that’s the point unless it’s a philanthropic endeavour. Really though, people don’t need 30 million dollar estates and bank accounts with snow balling interest. How much is enough to be comfortable and when does just wanting to be comfortable turn into wanting to devour the world? How much success is too much success?

Perhaps a lot of economic problems are because of so much money going into non-circulating accounts. Money that goes in and never comes out, ever.

After the last industrial revolution industry the world saw a financial revolution. It became possible to snowball finances exponentially in some cases, with little to no work involved.

Do people act greedy out of love? I don’t think so. But the motivations start, I’m sure, with wanting to take of yourself, love for yourself is still love isn’t it? But …

No you know what… any personal overhead over 15 million should be pushed back into the system. People don’t need fucking 50, 000 square feet yards and 2 mile drive ways and private islands. It’s bullshit, really like what the fuck.

AND STOP TRYING TO GO TO SPACE
FUCKING VISIT THE OCEAN FIRST
LIKE SHIT, WHAT IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE LOL

Play Things

Video Games are akin to books and movies, and yet toys.

Art can be a highly questionable concept that might be associated onto conceivably anything with any context for whatever principles or philosophies. If there is a subject on earth that could be associated with the pinnacle of broad extremism, it might be the proclamation and subsequent questioning of an art subject.
An exceptional example of this would be ‘Piss Christ’ a picture taken in 1987 by Andres Serrano that is of a small crucifix photographed in a jar of the photographer’s urine. In addition, twenty years later his exhibit ‘Shit’ that was a collection of feces from various subjects photographed on a pedestal.
Therefore, people have said Andres Serrano’s pictures are art and people have questioned ‘is it art?’ which is a prime question that seems to perpetuate art debates. A question that is more of a doubtful remark than anything else and probably the number one source of art debates.

Is the subject highly questionable?
Is the subject difficult to understand?
Does the subject stimulate thoughts or emotions?
Does the subject have some sort of cultural or natural semblances?
Whether the answer is yes or no to the questions it is art. It is always art. Someone can say ‘No, it’s shit.’ and yet it seems in the case of Andres Serrano and his 08′ collection, yes, indeed, it certainly is shit.

Inchoative Stressors

Inchoactivity is a concept that describes the beginning to an unfolding sequence of events as they occur, always to insinuate a new act is soon to begin, or harks on previous actions in a self-referencing succession. This inchoative principle is common sense and philosophical vomit. For the most part when you let go of a ball it drops to the ground, the inception of a consequential action. The coffee drank in the morning before work may trigger caffeine related stress anxiety latter that day. With each action and reaction spawn a reasonably unforeseeable string of events that carry enough potential to greatly influence your life and the lives of others. And I feel it is necessary out of personal responsibility and necessity to recount the potential of our actions before we execute them.

Health is a major concern on the media front as well as on the social front. The social front being directly affected by the media front characterizes the larger sum of social issues through a form of media exploitation. The newly publicized issues may become increasingly mundane by means of recitation. Politics, environment concerns, and a good diet are among the many perpetuated false concerns in media.

What does it mean to have a good diet? This has been a topic of debate for a very long time. The food pyramid has been revised time and time again and is often looked upon with great regard. Why? The media has been proven wrong, the pyramids were wrong, and to this day the pictures of what a balanced diet should look like, even after several revisions time and time again, are wrong. The new pyramid which generalizes the old standard diet which consisted of several helpings of heavy grains and saturated fats is destroyed. As it’s measly five food groups revel in absolutism and inadequacy. Commonplace suggestions are practiced widely throughout the world. Suggestions like have two full meals a day lingers on because someone has to ask what full means. The real answer? Feel full. Is that healthy? I don’t know, does it feel good to eat? Why do you have to be so paranoid? Enjoy your life and stop trying to live up to a public standard. The law of normalcy says “Normal doesn’t exist.” normal is an artificial fixed point that’s assumed to create an aspect of mediocrity so that folks don’t go insane doing a things like… living their own lives… or thinking too much, doing and eating whatever they like. Like duh! Really. You want to eat nothing but potato chips for breakfast, lunch and dinner, that’s fine. But you’ll feel like shit and when you feel like shit, if you feel like asking yourself why, or decipher any creative means to improve your well being then do it. If you like doing something that’s illegal, well hey, do it till you get caught. That’s reasonable and realistic isn’t it? Why do those ideas seem so awkward? Because you are trying to learn how to be yourself, from other people.

The new pyramid takes into account food genres, serving sizes, considers age, height, and weight, as well as establishes estimations for pregnant woman who individualistically require far more dairy fats, high nutrient, high mineral rich foods, in short, pregnant females need more food either to sustain their baby and themselves, or to produce great breast milk. With all this taken into consideration common sense says not much has changed, that much can be certain.

An objective skepticism and listening to your body are both great tools when considering what you like to eat and how you feel when you’ve eaten it while what your body wants to eat may very well manifest in specific cravings. This doctrine also applies to the consumer aspect of life in retrospect.

Industrial foodstuffs like candy, and substitutions if eaten regularly can weaken the immune system while also decreasing longevity. It’s under professional dispute that emotional dispositions can become weakened as well. An Eat Right authority figure like the latest pop culture craze or media exploit are all disillusioned attempts at insinuating that many people may know how to eat, but do not possess enough knowledge to know what to eat, and this is true. So it’s up to the smart ones to discern what’s really right for them.

What is the purpose of making people think their lifestyle is damaging?
So the media front can profit from telling you what to do and how to do it?
So industry can put their product in so many places at once that it seems all too mundane or usual, normal, and nonhazardous?

No matter where you go you will see their product, on for cheap, priced to clear, and right at eye level. Marketed exactly so in time hopefully you, the consumer, begin to accept their product and expect it to be good for you otherwise;
“it wouldn’t be around” and “it wouldn’t be selling so much” if it were a bad thing. It’s in too many places at once to not be overwhelming. Wake up!

Once they show you something enough it becomes normal no one cares about it anymore! Part of this illusion is to make consumers believe the product is popular and good for you. You’ll see the image of the product in stores, magazines, and advertising, you’ll see it on store shelves and countertops at eye height. This is aimed to make you assume it’s a popular, well priced, and selling, a product that many people purchase and use. The assumption is then made right then and there that it is mundane and not hazardous to anybody.

Lashing out at others or lashing out at oneself without the means to an end, creative outlook, or plan-to-action can leave the stressed feeling a greater sense of impending threat, fear even. Anxiety and nervous breakdowns based on emotionally invested ideas. Such as “multiblade razors are a good choice” or “Soda pop is harmless” Something like a better shave is only a little patience away, maybe another beard reduction pass. But who has time for that? Not someone hopped up on caffeinated soda or coffee that’s for sure. Events usually revolving around a time scale can create a sense of over anticipation in periods of overcompensation. Looking all too forward to the fulfillment of personal interest without feeling satisfied. Instead the personal gratification is rushed and seems neither rational nor the way to go.

When should our expectation take others into account?
Is an aspect of priority present and realistic?
Wants or needs? Can you or anyone else tell the difference?

Static stress is a chronic stressing dealt with commonly and usually expressed extremely. It’s casual issues that have never been dealt with and seem to rise again and again without an end in sight. With no logic or reasoning it’s difficult to rationalize solutions to these problems and depending on the extremity of the trouble or emotional status of those involved it could be awhile before a calm word can be spoken about the issues at hand. In many cases trying to talk about static stress issues result in a chronic anxiety coming to the surface and can create a lashing reaction that demands that not only should no one speak of the problems but also that it is or has become too painful to deal with – this can usually be hinted at by passive reactions or tantrums.

Having just calmed down from a high emotional state, who wants to be in a frenzy again? Everyone just wants to relax after dealing with their stress. And they will deal with the stress and those in proximity will deal with the stress time and time again until the stressors are what is dealt with. Firmly set stressors having not been addressed over extenuated periods create a steady discomfort which will always surface to a visible dermal layer of pressing anxiety making so much as hinting at a plan of action elusive and discouraged. It’s not really easy, but we can’t be lazy. And that can be especially difficult.

We shouldn’t deal with stress commonly. It can become an unhealthy cycle for the self and an annoying cycle for peers. It’s always better to address issues sooner more so than latter – always.

I’ve heard a saying something like “Always is never enough and never is always untrue.” one too many times and the words always and never are key terms in excuses, so look out for them. These words are warning signs of lies and misrepresentations.

Having emotions doesn’t necessarily mean morals and having morals doesn’t necessarily mean having rational or logical thoughts. Decompress and examine problems for what they really are. When it comes to finally putting thoughts and ideas together be aware of the expectations and limitation. What may feel like a solution might very well be an expectation and sometimes it’s our expectations that make our problems worse. Sometimes it’s our arbitration to feel more than think and sometimes it’s an arbitration to think more about feelings than to really understand what it means to figure out the real problem and work towards or at least consider plausible solutions to our everyday dilemmas.

Think cohesive and act responsible.

Life is Control

We are driven through necessity to gain and retain the ability to cultivate money. Our survival depends on it and you, as a human being cannot avoid it. I’m certain several people through the ages have longed for work or employment not for what they can do for others but what they want for themselves, thinking always and only about what they have to gain, what they must gain. If you are a construction worker and you are contracted to build where a fresh water pond used to be you would do it. That’s your job and that’s what you do. You’d have something to gain, your continued lifestyle and the companies who commissioned the contract would have real-estate to sell to people who just want to fuck in private, spawn babies, and whom hopefully will see them grow up to be just like Mom and Dad.

Aren’t all the operations of human kind based on our united strength?
Isn’t that the whole point of working for others?

Others get richer while you toil away, reaping only but the most remedial benefits in hopes that you will profit from a well-accommodated life that lets you eat, shit, and fuck how you like.

The Earth is not dieing. If anyone concedes and accepts the terms;
“We are killing the planet.” then they also concede to Gaia theory which denotes the planet is a living thing like you or I.

We are overly contrived ego-driven idiots believing whatever spoon is fed into the gapping gullets of our illustrious cattle class. The cattle class wants to be like the rich class because more money means better food and happiness, maybe it could even mean better sex. When really, the fat ones in the cattle class are not unlike the rich class as they too are busy shoveling whatever they are given into their bellies, up on drugs, too busy to have a conscious thought as next meal is already done, frozen, and in waiting. L. Ron Hubbard the founder of scientology once wrote that being overweight or fat was good survival. He too was fat and rich. Maybe he was trying to make himself feel better. We all die. Everyone dies. Some fat people die from terrible violent heart problems. Religion won’t stop it and a new solar panel powered HD television may only make it worse. A lot of the cattle class knows the rules. They stick to the yard, close to the trough.

Animals don’t need to be conserved. Conservationists are not saving wild life they are containing it. Every animal tagged is maimed. Three in five animals caught in the name of documentation are taken apart and analyzed. A biologist tented a small island about thirty years ago and filled it with toxic gas. The experiment is based on trying to find out how long it takes for diverse life to come back. This is good science and a billion dollar industry. Billons of dollars are needed so that people pick up their shit and get some actual work done at some point.

Where I come from on these issues is in finding that the human species has claimed this planet. We have claimed the title of dominance. Over ninety nine percent of all life species that has ever lived has died off. The space race I was and is still mostly about getting us as faraway from this solar system as possible in the event of a catastrophic celestial event that would otherwise render earth uninhabitable, so as to avoid complete obliteration. Hopefully we may avoid a celestial event that could destroy Earth. That’s one of our species current goals and I don’t think cats and dogs are coming for the ride either. I think we are having pity on them.

As such, all other forms of life on this planet are obsolete, as they cannot outrun celestial events – not unless we want them to. Although at this point we can’t either, but we can however terraform the landscape to better suit us until then. By creating our own environment away from the affects of weather, we can be sustain ourselves. A dog dieing of cold in winter has got nothing at all compared to a cardboard box, shed, garage, or our houses. Our personal space is even more important to us through rough times as sometimes the atmosphere doesn’t agree with us so we close the windows and adjust our thermostats accordingly, like a space station or point of deployment. Cloths are like our second layer of skin completely necessary for our survival on more than one occasion, slightly reminiscent of space suits in that regard, as we require them to survive on earth at this point. We are continuing to look into space travel. We’re doing a lot of our experiments here on Earth totally passively and presented in an acceptably mundane way. We let animals live out of pity. Not love. We have pets because it’s a mundane subconscious way of claiming their dependency. They will only live if we let them. We hang onto technology with tooth and nail because we know without it we our future would be lost.

I used to ask myself questions like “In the end is survival worth slavery?” and “What is freedom if we are not free?” and I would embark on such taboos with the ardent approximations I am desperate to perceive, that people don’t want to work but work because they have to. Our societies system of work or the societal circle jerk that I’ve come to call it with much undo regard and scorn is a very thought out system that is created to perpetuate itself, which is why it has survived and will remain for ages maybe even eons to come as most of our legacies will be carved out of it’s continuance. Recently I approached the idea that work is not slavery, although we have to do it regardless if we want to or not, completely regardless of that, work is a form of altruism and should be liked and fun. Work is an extension of love to others, as if the human species came together through the ages not for personal gain but for unity and compassion in the name of our neighbor’s neighbors and their kin. These things only being thought in a refreshing soliloquy I began to notice that more people agreed with my ‘modern slavery idea’ with a kind of depressive and reluctant “Oh.” over the positive aforementioned. Uninspiring as both ideas are, it seems both are tried simultaneously. Which is why everyone has and needs a job.

One of our jobs, concerns, and passions is animals. Animals do not need protection where protection equals absolute control. It’s an oxymoron to call it what it’s not. A wildlife park is a designated area for wildlife to live. It’s not built to make a zone where people can’t kill them; it’s made so that we don’t have to kill them if they wonder into our territory. They have their side we have ours. All animals are cute and cuddly to us. We have a fetish-like lust to take care of them because we know already that we have potentially killed them all. This fetish-like attraction is not unlike the same attractions some people feel for those who wear glasses, or those who think braces add a level of cuteness to a smile. These are attractions to disabilities or weakness as it appeals to us in a way that says, “I can protect you.” Which also in a sense says control and through control total ownership.

Energy is not a problem it’s a solution. A new low input high output machine has less to do with ecology and more to do with economy. You won’t save an owl using a more expensive long lasting light source. You won’t save anything but money by spending more now and less latter. That’s it. This rule applies to fish and low flow toilets and this rule also applies to furnaces and global warming. If we have to take precautions on a can do basis the issues are obviously not as severe as they could be. Things could be much worse if we stopped trying, which tells me we have to try harder in every aspect of our life. A slow push is being made toward the total conversations to come. Global temperature alteration, animals dieing, environmental damage, these things are happening. You cannot prevent these events in anyway as they are already happening. You can only try to depress the event in your own individual way. Or at least that’s what media is telling everyone right now. Media abuses our passion for learning and exploits our tendencies. Media has this way of making people who consume it paranoid. It’s really difficult to get away from bad media. Reliable news sources shouldn’t print celebrity gossip, or religious dogma.

When real information is in short supply creating a social flux is the next thing to do. Consider this…

What would mass media have to talk about if not for 911?

Where does knowledge stop being informative and start becoming redundant?

Detractors of Faith

The tides like the dusk and dawn, the rotation of our planet, and seasons are rhythmic. Our twenty four hour clock is titled the circadian rhythm. Circa means around and Diem loosely means day which translates to “around one day”, approximately. The distinction of this rhythm says we have twenty four hours in a day. Through the repetition of this pattern through eons this rhythm is manifest within the tissues of every organism on the planet. This constancy has been developed through a centered planetary cycle around The Sun. Continental drift is caused by a subterranean sea of planetary fluids. Tectonic plates are adrift on these fluids and the activity of these plates can be monitored through sophisticated computer imaging satellites from space. The gentle tidal drifting of these plates almost seems like relaxed circulation.

Life had to come from somewhere; religion exists to say that it came from god. And without any other evidence or criteria for understanding you simply have faith to be true to that. God did it. To say “God did it!” is plainly ignorant. When envisioning a human link but moreover an excuse to propagate blind ignorance – that sits more in humanities egomania than natural truths. How the stars and our planet got here can be explained as monumental scientific evidence has been asserted on those subjects. How you and I got here can be difficult to imagine in many respects. Just like you or I were born so were the sun and our planet born. Planets and stars formed  by incomprehensibly ancient celestial objects with which interacted with each other and through stabilization settled to a calm rotation. Our parents came to be through their parents and their parents interactions with one another all with whom had an infinite number of choices they could have made in their lifetimes which could have ultimately rendered you non existent, yet here you are. Your entire life has built up to this very moment. Doesn’t it feel so relevant?!

When speaking of any religious texts including but not limited to The Holy Bible they will be regarded generally as The Bible and it will be italicized for all intensive purposes as the disclosure of one common volume will not occur.*

Religion has an allegorical pretense that runs thicker and more profoundly than any other cultural phenomenon. Jesus stands more as a caricature for modernizing times, while the image of Jesus with superficial connotation aside in regards to ethnicity, can allegorically describe the working man. A man who is to carry the weight of his labor to endure life until the end of his days. He is subjected to complete social isolation and societal expulsion for his lack of conformity and individualistic idealism. He is portrayed as a drinker and metaphorically transposes the bread of a baker as his sacrificial flesh and blood, having toiled to create delicious bread for the people. The image of Jesus composes the image of a radical enemy of the state who in speaking out against the religion of the times upholding his own by declaring himself the begotten son of god – The story of Jesus and the iconic actions against him.

His image stands as the embodiment of the system to be created around him and the perfect figurehead to the generations that would rise from his glory. The generations of which did rise and whos fellowship went on to destroy those who questioned its power and will to determine the future and destiny of the modern world.
The story of Jesus was written after these revolutions occurred and that is the grand revelation of the religious text written not in his image but in his caricature. Slaves did not build the pyramids, incredible wealthy Hebrews hired workers and took slaves to build them, new evidence has been found to justify this. The Hebrew slave legend is a myth and a modern lie. It was written as an omen and propelled around the world, gallantly in the name of a self professing piece of literature. The workers involved in the building of the monuments, in the same light of the Aztecs were killed by a crusade like no other. The same crusade that saw to the death of witches, heathens, and pagans. Throughout time those who relish in the name of Jesus Christ and call them selves Christians inserted themselves into non believing sects of humanity and disbanded them through torment and anxiety. The Central American Aztecs were destroyed by Christian Spaniards. There is a sculptor in Mexico City who made in memoriam of the day when the Aztec god of war “came to see the light from the one true god”. Which loosely remarks on the day the Aztec genocide began. The sculpture depicts an Aztec lord, presumably the last king in a humbled humane form, arms raised as if to be asking for mercy, while two other Aztecs stand in dismay, a mother and child huddled, all of whom seem to be reaching out to an eagle three times their size atop a cactus with a small garden snake in it’s beak.

Religious charms have been taken from the bloodied hands of other cultures. Religion has an allegorical pretense that runs thicker and more profoundly than any other cultural phenomenon. Jesus stands more as a caricature for modernizing times, while the image of Jesus with superficial connotation aside in regards to ethnicity, can allegorically describe the working man. A man who is to carry the weight of his labour to endure life until the end of his days. He is subjected to complete social isolation and societal expulsion for his lack of conformity and individualistic idealism. He is portrayed as a drinker and metaphorically transposes the bread of a baker as his sacrificial flesh and blood, having toiled to create delicious bread for the people. The image of Jesus composes the image of a radical enemy of the state who in speaking out against the religion of the times upholding his own by declaring himself the begotten son of god – The story of Jesus and the iconic actions against him.Cultures of which, sanctimoniously came from other cultures. Since humans have propagated this earth we have led ourselves to believe in whatever it takes to get the job done. We get it done the precise way that we were instructed. Religious text stands as the folly of man as it only does half of its job. The first half requires a system that is self sustaining so the work may be perpetuated, the other half requires interpretation for the cycle to be complete. Interpretive thoughts reside within the minds of those under siege by this war of thought. The Bible is a questionable article by context as it stands The Bible is an abomination in this age. The Bible is possibly the most contrived article in existence. So many variations exist which complicates the understanding of it’s context so that when mentioning The Bible a generalization has to be made of the volume, reprint, or translation where not cited. No other religious text has such folly in relying on the mental residuals of others as these residual thoughts are based solely on personal interpretations or assumptions and are created in many instances through extremes either for the sole purpose of understanding, basic recognition, or identification of the subjects disclosed. Interpretative measures have been taken over the previous centuries to catalogue and interpret where the previous generation left off. Such committees as the one assigned by King James, simply and sadly starts a whole new line of contrived opinion surfing, the debate as to whose copy should be the only copy when previous copies flourished before it. It wouldn’t be too outlandish to suppose that the same comity agreed to have mass burnings of rival literature. All of these actions of which add to the continuance and relevance of the literature itself. No real authority stands to make light of the situation.

In calendar reform all major calendar revisions were to be considered acceptable primarily by the pope and then the people. This debate is fluent through reproduction after retraction. This replicating religious idealism has transcended rationality and become a modern plague. The basis is clear but we still find those who speak outwardly in public. Television shows us that our government and our society as a whole, is invested with it. It’s not religion that has a hold of society, it‘s dogma. It’s not The Bible or differing concepts or ideas of God. It’s confusion and the resulting dogma.

Every religious text tells us to love and fight for love (or is it fight with our love?). Fraught with confusion different sects holding conflicting religious belief claim their opinions to be the righteous ones and as such the only one that need exist. Righteousness or falsity on the other is the game played in many extremist sects.

When we look at how small we are in the universe, even within our own galaxy, we find that our little specks on this pebble can’t get along because we have different ideas, we believe in a contrived kind of glory that clouds us. One truth about all of humanities egomaniacal ploys refers to its species and our contrived teachings in religion and history. If we can mate and we are going to die whether we want to or not, if life as we know it depends upon our procreation then we probably should mate. If life is a disease then I am suffering from the human condition and I want nothing to do with these tail chasing fools too confused and too caught up in running around circles, running after one another’s genitals.

Humanity has a lot of areas in great need of improvement. Fighting – in forms other than play, is one of the foremost. Efficiency and control will prevail, not the word of a God. That is why Zeus is dead and beheaded by the modern rite. Gods are stories and like story books get told to the children so that when they come of age and have an orgasm realize that it was a story, and with this realization become aged and haggard. The modern human is their child and we are slowly learning our lessons as we grow older remembering the past but also remembering to burn it and let it go. We don’t need religious sentiment anymore and it is nearing it‘s expiration date. We have an area of focus that is very real and very powerful, our collaborations with one another. Like many studies technology is a life study, a hapless love for pride and labour that dictates our modern life and survival. In areas of adapted technology where it has picked up rather quickly. It’s showing the progressive sign of an evolving organism as it helps humanity become more of an abomination and we help it to slowly personify itself. Love is something we can either fight for or fight with. Our determination to dictate to others what they are doing and detracting from what we have is evidently similar in so many ways. We become distant to our loved ones trying to make the business of others our own while they themselves feel similarly and do similarly. That scenario seems like something modern humans would drink over at a pub or watch on a drama based television show. They would disclose their emotions in a profoundly personal manner for the consideration of others, as they look for support in others where they otherwise have none. It’s the followers who go after other followers the mauling that is portrayed consistently in whatever media we ignorant fools can get our hands on. These situations are not happening because of The Bible or The Torah or Zohar or the bloodied Qur’an! It’s because of us, humans! It’s because someone will hear you or see you and come to the conclusion that you are correct beyond a shadow of a doubt and probably base their life on whatever it is you just did! We learn from each other and thus learn to be ourselves through carving out our own personalities and psyche from the individualism of others which we bare reference of ourselves.

It takes a hailstorm like saying religion is a problem to bring it home, while it takes a thing like television to make it a nightmare. If religion isn’t a problem – respect that. But if you speak personally with others on religious subjects, especially on the internet, you are looking for trouble. Divulging personal opinions leaves you vulnerable to attack as anyone anywhere can retort and if you’re speaking on a truthful, personal level, or you have come to invest a great deal of emotion into what it is you are saying, you may very well be attacked by someone who will take all of the attention your willing to give them and turn you into a puppet of torment for their own amusement. In many circumstances the strongly opinionated on the internet have to be outright ignored as they revert to volley after volley of statements engineered to have you answer and slowly but surely you begin to conform to their words lest you do not reply to them.

Ideology is a storm in conversation as idealism may control our views and interactions with others and in many cases those who have strong ideologies won’t stand for anything other than agreement. And that is how religion becomes thought control. Our actions fuse with our thoughts and it becomes us.
Religion is a masturbating idiom as is our history and culture. These are games played by a self referencing society who is masturbating in front of a mirror.
Life just happened and this truth is a progressive constant.
Do you believe life popped into existence by the hands of god?
Or do you say “Life didn’t just happen.”?
Did your God do this?
I can tell you my God did. And my god is worshiped by religions and scientists world wide. My God is regarded as factual and real by atheists. There is no refuting to this living being that is my God. It created life as we know it, my god makes things happen and because of the sequence of events that has unravelled we have come before our existence, humbled as we are.

I am not an Atheist and I am not an Agnostic or Scientologist. I don’t subscribe to any religious practise but I have faith in one singular form that is the reason for all of existence. The Force as George Lucas and the writers of Star Wars put it is “around us and binds us” where science simply decrees it is the governing action of our universe reacting to itself. Physics is the one true god of the universe – maybe not a being but the anatomy of a being.

Physics is a science of approximation. Approximations prove everything as we cannot dictate the purity of a substance in that of which has none. And thus theory or a grand educated guess and the generalized statistics that we use as proof is all we will ever have on the matter. God is the rationalizing of a force of which governs our creation. This can only be asserted as Physics.

The Start a story taught by dead and gone Alchemists told the legend of a particle that split in its loneliness. I think of more of it as the first particle died as it split in a natural process of procreation. The reaction between the first and the second particles created a third that was not directly manifest but was reactive process in the same way a negative side on a magnet attracts a positive side as a conjectural force between these two points became manifest and although not entirely physical. The presence of the third particle. This is the theoretical beginning of everything. As the third particle or the empty space in between becomes a point of contact the result of this contact is the approximation of The Star of it All.
These two forces and the interaction between them alternate and cycle creating a magnetic field effect, radiation, or maybe more of a colliding explosion. As particles begin to interact with one another overlapping, collapsing, combining, interchanging, and nullifying each other. The condensing particles become larger masses of radioactive matter governed by new external forces, like gravity. Akin to the same electrical pull of the particles that caused a formation of this new matter has an amazing new centripetal force. These new matters become installations of gravitational flux, fossilization from unwavering particles with which were obliterated by nullification, and contradictions such as two positives and the detracting force between. The greater rotational mass is a center or nucleus like a sun, black hole, or nebula of charges particles.

Atheists and religion seekers can share in a hug now.

Check out my slightly eccentric video that exemplifies this subject here:
The Literariness Particle and The Anatomy of God
Respectfully*